No headshots

So I was discussing the whole concept with a few classmates when I said that I didn't want to include critical kills like head shots.  They thought that I was going to have a lot of problems since head shots have been a part of the FPS mindset for such a long time.  So I thought a little explanation of why I feel critical kill shots shouldn't be a part of this game.

1. Being killed in one shot really stinks.  There have been many games that the head shot insta-kill makes the game very frustrating, especially for new players. Ace of Spades in particular comes to mind, and I have personally taken on 5 or 6 players and killed them all before the could get me just because I was able to shoot their heads faster than they could shoot me.  While in real life it is very possible for 1 or 2 bullets to take someone out, in a game or an experiment like I am hoping to make this like I wish to encourage competition and a moderate feeling of fair play.

2. It is bad practice to aim for the head in real life combat.  The first day of M16 training in the Army they instruct all soldiers to aim for the center of mass.  On a human the center of mass is just between the stomach and the chest, where incidentally a large number of vital organs are located.  So while it is true that shooting someone in the head will kill them, shooting them in a place you are more likely to hit them like the chest has just as much a chance of killing them.  While I realize games don't have to be like real life combat, for the few people who do get put into a combat situation I would like to have this game be good training for them.

3. I want this game to have the feel of a RTS game, but with the players being the individual soldiers.  In most RTS games there are certain classes that are stronger than other, but typically there is a decent balance between same level entities.  In Starcraft for example, a single terran marine vs. a single protoss zealot would be a fairly matched fight in which one or the other may win depending on the strategies used.  If the marine could kill the zealot in one shot by shooting his head, that balance would be shifted.  Now I know there are players out there claiming that since heads are smaller and there is a chance to miss that head shots are really skill shots and should be rewarded, but if the reward is your enemy not even being able to counter attack in any way it's too powerful.  And so the head will only get damaged as much as the torso.

I hope this explains well enough why I don't wan't to have instant kills.  Even vehicle mounted weaponry will seem a little under powered in the game, as the goal is not the super fast paced die every 30 seconds combat normally found in FPS games, rather the stay alive and do as much damage (or prevent as much damage) strategically type game.

The Official Google TV Blog: OnLive: Console-class Gaming Comes to Google TV

Ok this could be big news for cloud gaming. If Google starts supporting it with the large amount of server power and it's amazing amount of internet influence then we could see it really take off.

The Official Google TV Blog: OnLive: Console-class Gaming Comes to Google TV: Videogames just took a huge leap into the future with OnLive cloud gaming on Google TV. With Google TV, you take it for granted that y...

Linear Algebra, Matrices, and 3D math

I realize that it appears that I have not made any real progress on this game for some time now.  I'm finding that there are many principles that I need to learn before trying to tackle 3D.  Part of that is math, which I have been struggling through for a little while.  I highly recommend that anyone who is interested in doing anything 3D learn about linear algebra.  A brief explanation is that it is the math that helps give the illusion of 3D on a 2D surface (like your TV or monitor).  Anyway the learning process is slow as I'm not as young as in times past.  As I have said before this will take a long time, especially since I want to do it right.

No competition inside of a faction

I've been thinking a bit about this subject and how to bring it into this game.  Often in MMOs players find themselves competing with their allies for resources such as better armor, that special drop that only one person can get, whoever has the highest number of enemy killed, etc... I really want to bring in the concept that if someone on my team (in my faction for example) gets something that it is a reason to be happy and not envious.

In war situations any resources that can be gained by ones allies or denied ones enemies is a bonus.  So for example I don't want to put a limit or respawn timer on resource nodes because it would make it so players within a faction would have to fight over who gets it and when.  It would also encourage camping, territorial disputes, and make it difficult for new players to get necessary resources.  So what I envision is a large group heading to a resource node would welcome any and all who happen to want to join them, because that means there will be more of that resource for the faction.  Having more people with you mean more backpack space to fill up with valuable metal or energy crystals.  Also the larger numbers would make enemy ambushes and other enemy attempts to deny ones faction resources less effective, meaning that for all in the faction it is a win. I think that would promote teamwork, camaraderie, and esprit de corp inside a faction, which is necessary if a faction wants to be successful.  So that means there will be no special bonus given to the elite other than the satisfaction of completing the mission. I do realize there are players out there who obsess over leader boards  and the acquisition of status symbols, and this game may not be for them